During periods of strict regulations on chemical testing, individuals tended to invest more in their savings, whereas during times of increased chemical testing, spending habits rose. This suggests that the perceived risk of environmental disaster reduces the inclination of individuals to delay consumption in favor of saving. The argument above assumes that

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

the perceived risk of environmental disaster has diminished over time

a majority of individuals favored the expansion of chemical testing

individuals' perception of the environmental risk is influenced by the level of chemical testing conducted

Correct

those who saved the most during the restrictions on chemical testing were primarily supporters of those restrictions

there are more available products when chemical testing is on the rise

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The argument states that the perceived risk of environmental disaster affects people's willingness to save money. It implies that when chemical testing increases, the perception of risk changes, leading to increased spending. Therefore, the assumption that best…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

PratitiApr 7, 2025

Can someone explain it other way?

RubenApr 27, 2025

thanks!

HarryFeb 14, 2024

Great

AnkitNov 13, 2024

thanks

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the unstated assumption a critical-reasoning argument depends on.

Common trap

Picking an option that strengthens the argument or is merely relevant instead of one that is required.