Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
655-705
Complete the Passage
Numerous investigations have indicated that the phenomenon of song overlapping, where one bird starts singing while another of its kind is already singing, may indicate aggression. These investigations rely exclusively on receiver-response experiments, which aim to draw conclusions about the intent of a signal based on the reactions of others. However, any reaction—even a lack of reaction—can be interpreted as a response to perceived aggression. Therefore, __________________. Which one of the following most logically completes the argument?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
Birds did not respond in a consistent way to signals of aggression
B
Receiver-response experiments cannot provide insights into avian behavior
Song overlapping is probably not an indication of aggression
Correct
D
Song overlapping serves no communicative purpose
E
The findings of these investigations are unconvincing
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument states that song overlapping is concluded to be a signal of aggression based on receiver-response tests. However, since any response can be interpreted as a reaction to perceived aggression, it raises doubts about the validity…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
T
TeddyFeb 3, 2025
thanks
P
PeeyushApr 5, 2025
Great!
R
raghavAug 14, 2024
This is exactly what I needed to practice
Y
YatharthJan 9, 2024
Thanks for sharingThank you for sharing!!thanks for sharing
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can complete the last sentence of an argument in a way that is logically consistent with it.
Common trap
Choosing an option that sounds plausible but contradicts the argument or introduces new information.
Details
Difficulty
655-705
Type
CR