Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
655-705
Complete the Passage
Several investment analysts claim that they can consistently achieve better returns on their portfolios compared to the overall market by investing in stocks they believe are undervalued. However, classical economic theory introduces the 'efficient market hypothesis', which suggests that stock prices reflect all available public information about the underlying assets. If the efficient market hypothesis holds true, then it should be expected that_____________.
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
(A) investment analysts will drive up the prices of certain stocks beyond their actual worth due to competition
B
(B) investment analysts rely on confidential information, which is illegal, to outperform the market
C
(C) stock prices will consistently increase over time
(D) based on public information alone, it is not possible to accurately categorize stocks as undervalued or overvalued compared to the market
Correct
E
(E) some investment analysts will consistently outperform others in generating returns
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) posits that all available information is already reflected in stock prices, meaning that it is impossible to consistently achieve higher returns than the market average based solely on public information.…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
S
SahilJan 31, 2025
Can you explain more?
T
TarushMar 8, 2025
thanks for the answer
P
PatrickMay 6, 2024
thank you for sharing
C
coderMar 7, 2025
Thank for sharing!!!
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can complete the last sentence of an argument in a way that is logically consistent with it.
Common trap
Choosing an option that sounds plausible but contradicts the argument or introduces new information.
Details
Difficulty
655-705
Type
CR