In constructing a persuasive argument, it is crucial to differentiate between hypothesis and evidence, and to understand the role of each. A hypothesis proposes an idea or theory that may hold true, but it needs the backing of evidence to substantiate it. Evidence serves as the validation or proof that supports a hypothesis; without evidence, the hypothesis remains merely a proposition for consideration and an idea with potential. A hypothesis is not always unwelcome in a persuasive argument, but it must be grounded in relevant evidence from similar cases or examples. An argument based solely on a hypothesis often leads to conjecture, while an argument that incorporates a hypothesis supported by relevant evidence can be quite compelling.

Which of the following does the passage above suggest?