When three Everett-owned Lightning-built airplanes crashed in the same month, the Everett company ordered three new Lightning-built airplanes as replacements. This decision surprised many in the airline industry because, ordinarily when a product is involved in accidents, users become reluctant to buy that product.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best indication that the Everett company’s decision was logically well supported?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowSee the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
thanks, this one was pretty straightforward once I saw the pilot error part.
yeah same, the crashes weren't the plane's fault so buying more makes sense
Wait, why is A wrong? competing manufacturers had a perfect record... doesn't that make Lightning look worse?
that's the point, A would weaken the decision not support it
right, we need something showing the planes themselves are still trustworthy
B makes sense to me. pilot error means the product is fine, and the survivors thing shows the planes are actually well built.
easy q but the wording threw me off at first, took me a sec to figure out what 'logically well supported' meant here
lol same, i was looking for the strongest evidence the decision was smart
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most bolsters an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an option that is consistent with the argument but adds no new support, or that shifts the topic.