Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
A group of teenagers of different ages participated in a survey where they were asked to evaluate the actions of individuals who caused harm, some doing so on purpose and others by mistake. When asked about suitable consequences for those who caused harm, the younger teenagers, unlike the older ones, suggested consequences that did not change based on whether the harm was intentional or accidental. This suggests that younger teenagers do not consider intentions important when determining consequences.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowYounger teenagers are just as likely to cause harm unintentionally as older teenagers.
Correct
B
The older teenagers assigned consequences in a manner similar to how adults assigned consequences in a related study.
C
In these scenarios, the extent of the harm caused was clearly defined.
D
The younger teenagers assigned consequences that varied based on the severity of the harm caused by the individuals in the scenarios.
E
Interpreting these scenarios required a mature understanding of human behavior to differentiate between intentional and accidental harm.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
To weaken the conclusion that younger teenagers do not regard intentions as relevant to punishment, we need to provide evidence that suggests their reasoning might be influenced by factors other than their understanding of intentions. Option 0 states that younger teenagers are just as likely to cause harm unintentionally as older teenagers. This implies that younger teenagers may not have a…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
S
SaketFeb 19, 2025
thanks!
J
JoydeepJan 17, 2025
Great question!
J
JahnviJan 21, 2025
Thank you very much!
D
DivyanshMay 31, 2024
good question
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR