A new brand of athletic gear claims that their specially designed running shorts can enhance performance by improving airflow and reducing drag, allowing runners to achieve faster times. They assert that wearing these shorts during a 5K run will significantly improve speed and endurance compared to traditional running shorts.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the claims of the athletic gear manufacturer?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

A. Research indicates that the material used in the shorts does not significantly differ from that of standard running shorts.

Correct

B. Studies show that runners who train consistently for longer periods tend to improve their times regardless of their gear.

C. It has been proven that the psychological effects of wearing new gear can lead to improved performance.

D. The design of the shorts includes pockets that can hold personal items, which may add weight.

E. Professional athletes often wear specialized gear that is tailored to their specific needs.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

To determine which statement most seriously undermines the claims of the athletic gear manufacturer, we need to analyze each option. The manufacturer claims that their running shorts enhance performance by improving airflow and reducing drag. If option A is true, it states that the material used in the shorts does not significantly differ from that of standard running shorts. This directly…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

RaparthyFeb 22, 2025

greatt question!

MaeMar 2, 2025

thanks for taking time to upload it!

NoelSep 28, 2024

Thank you very much!

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.