A new brand of athletic shoes claims that their innovative design will help users lose weight by enhancing fat burning and muscle development during walking. The company asserts that the shoes' elevated heel will minimize the risk of foot and ankle injuries while significantly increasing the fat-burning potential compared to standard sneakers. They also state that wearing these shoes for 30 minutes of walking each day will boost endurance and improve aerobic fitness.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously challenges the claims made by the shoe manufacturer?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

A. Research indicates that elevated heels can lead to increased strain on the knee joint, potentially resulting in injury.

Correct

B. Evidence suggests that walking for 30 minutes daily can enhance cardiovascular health, leading to better overall fitness.

C. It has been shown that the incline of the shoe sole affects the distribution of weight across the foot.

D. Studies have demonstrated that regular walking can improve muscle tone and metabolic efficiency.

E. The National Health Organization reports that walking for 30 minutes a day has minimal effect on weight loss.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

To determine which statement most seriously undermines the claims of the shoe manufacturer, we need to analyze each option in relation to the claims made. The manufacturer claims that the shoes will help with weight loss and reduce injuries. Option A states that research indicates elevated heels can lead to…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

NominFeb 6, 2025

thanks!

MohitMar 27, 2025

this helped me

AkshithMay 4, 2024

thank you very much!

HarshFeb 14, 2024

Can someone explain it other way?

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.