Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
A new brand of athletic shoes claims that their innovative design helps users lose weight by enhancing fat burning and muscle building during walking. The company asserts that the shoes' elevated heel design minimizes the risk of foot and ankle injuries while significantly increasing the fat-burning potential compared to standard sneakers. They also state that wearing these shoes for 30 minutes of walking each day will improve stamina and boost the aerobic benefits of exercise.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously challenges the claims made by the shoe manufacturer?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA. Research indicates that elevated heels can lead to increased strain on the knee joints, potentially causing long-term damage.
Correct
B
B. Evidence suggests that walking for 30 minutes daily contributes to improved cardiovascular health and weight management.
C
C. It has been shown that the height of the heel in shoes affects the alignment of the spine during walking.
D
D. Studies reveal that regular walking can enhance overall fitness levels, particularly in individuals with a sedentary lifestyle.
E
E. The National Health Organization reports that walking for 30 minutes a day has minimal effect on weight loss for most individuals.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The shoe manufacturer's claims are primarily focused on the benefits of their shoe design in terms of fat burning and injury prevention. If it is true that 'Research indicates that elevated heels can lead to increased strain on the knee joints, potentially causing long-term damage,' this directly undermines…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
S
SumitaFeb 4, 2025
can you explain more?
P
PavanajJan 31, 2025
Thank for sharing!
R
RaymondFeb 16, 2025
thanks!
S
SritamOct 23, 2024
pls explain more?
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR