Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
A pottery shard found in a site in Texas, 1,500 miles north of Mexico, is dated to be 9,500 years old. Researchers concluded that since the desert conditions prevented human migration north from the Mexico-United States border between 12,000 and 9,000 years ago, humans must have arrived in North America more than 12,000 years ago.
Which of the following pieces of new evidence would cast doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
(A) New archaeological findings in Arizona suggest human activity dating back to 11,500 years ago.
(B) A recent study indicates that an ancient river system allowed for easier migration north from Mexico at least 10,000 years ago.
Correct
C
(C) A geological survey revealed that the desert conditions were not as severe as previously thought, allowing for migration as early as 12,500 years ago.
D
(D) Radiocarbon dating of the pottery shard shows it to be at least 9,800 years old.
E
(E) Evidence from other regions indicates that humans could have migrated from Mexico to Texas in approximately 15 years after the desert conditions improved.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The researchers concluded that humans must have arrived in North America more than 12,000 years ago based on the pottery shard being dated to 9,500 years old and the assumption that desert conditions prevented migration. However, option (B) provides new evidence that an ancient river system allowed for easier…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
H
HoughMar 4, 2025
Amazing
A
AymenDec 22, 2024
thanks
T
TvApr 11, 2024
thanks
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR