Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
A recent analysis of toddler education indicates that the level of interaction children have during playtime influences their cognitive development. At two years old, toddlers in the study who engaged in less interactive playtime demonstrated an average of three points higher on cognitive assessments than those who had more interactive playtime. Given the importance of cognitive development in early childhood, educators might consider reducing the level of interaction during playtime. Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
A. Toddlers with more interactive playtime often show better social skills.
B
B. Toddlers who engage in less interactive playtime typically have longer nap durations.
C
C. Research indicated no significant link between playtime interaction and cognitive scores for children over four years old.
D
D. The toddlers who had less interactive playtime exhibited a higher rate of emotional distress.
E. Interaction during playtime is crucial for developing problem-solving skills.
Correct
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument suggests that reducing interaction during playtime could benefit cognitive development based on the observation that toddlers with less interaction scored higher on assessments. However, option E states that interaction during playtime is crucial for…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
S
sahilApr 4, 2025
Thank you very much!
H
HarryApr 14, 2024
thankss
M
MatthewMar 29, 2025
thanks
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR