Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
A recent analysis of toddler care indicated that the level of interaction toddlers have during the day influences their naptime. At twelve months, toddlers in the study with a less interactive daytime schedule napped an average of one hour more each day than those with a more interactive schedule. Given that naptime is crucial for a toddler's growth, caregivers should consider minimizing the level of interaction their toddlers experience. Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
A. Toddlers with more interactive routines often engage in physical activities that tire them out.
B
B. Toddlers with less interactive schedules typically take longer naps in the afternoon.
C
C. Research indicated no link between interaction levels and naptime for children four years of age or older.
D
D. The toddlers who had a less interactive routine showed improved social skills over time.
E. The level of interaction that toddlers receive contributes positively to their emotional development.
Correct
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument suggests that reducing interaction will lead to more naptime, which is beneficial for growth. However, option E states that the level of interaction contributes positively to emotional…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
P
PratikJan 8, 2025
Good question
Y
YousraJul 12, 2024
this pattern comes up frequently
L
LauraMay 7, 2024
Thank you very much!
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR