Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
A recent survey on puppy training indicated that the level of interaction puppies receive influences their playfulness. At four months old, puppies in the survey with a less interactive training routine displayed an average of one hour less playtime per day than those with a more interactive routine. Given that playtime is crucial for a puppy's social development, trainers might consider increasing the interaction levels during training. Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowPuppies with less interactive routines often engage in more independent play.
Correct
B
Puppies that receive more interaction tend to be more anxious.
C
Research found no link between interaction levels and playtime for dogs older than one year.
D
The puppies with less interactive routines showed improved obedience.
E
The interaction that puppies receive is essential for their emotional well-being.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument suggests that increasing interaction during training will lead to more playtime for puppies, as less interaction correlates with less playtime. However, if puppies with less interactive routines often engage in more independent play, this indicates that they may…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
S
SmritiJan 22, 2025
Good question
P
PriyanshiApr 11, 2025
finally understood this
A
AlstonJan 20, 2024
Can someone explain it other way?
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR