A review is needed regarding the activities of a private organization that is preparing volunteers to assist the Kingdom of Eldoria. The International Peace Agreement explicitly prohibits citizens from participating in military actions against any nation that is not in a state of war with their country. Since there is currently no declared war between the US and the Kingdom of Eldoria, we should take legal action against these individuals who are blatantly violating the agreement.

Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the argument above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

The Kingdom of Eldoria is currently experiencing a severe internal conflict.

Diplomatic ties between the US and the Kingdom of Eldoria were cut off last year.

The volunteers are being trained to assist only if the US declares war on the Kingdom of Eldoria.

Correct

The funding for the training of volunteers comes from international donors rather than US citizens.

Legal action cannot be initiated against the private organization without a formal inquiry.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

To weaken the argument that legal action should be taken against the private organization, we need to find a statement that suggests the organization is not violating the International Peace Agreement. Option C states that 'The volunteers are being trained to assist only if the US declares war on the Kingdom of Eldoria.'…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

CastroJan 28, 2025

Great question!

TommasoFeb 9, 2025

Amazing

AbhilashaOct 1, 2024

thank you for sharing

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.