A review must be conducted regarding the activities of a private organization that is preparing individuals to combat the Zandora Federation. The US Neutrality Act explicitly prohibits US citizens from participating in military actions against any country with which the US is not at war. Given that there is no declared war between the US and the Zandora Federation, we should file charges against these individuals, who are blatantly violating the law.

Which of the following, if true, would most undermine the argument above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

The Zandora Federation is currently involved in a severe internal conflict.

Diplomatic ties between the US and the Zandora Federation were cut last year.

The individuals are being prepared to fight only if the US declares war on the Zandora Federation.

Correct

The funding for the training of these individuals comes from foreign investors, not US citizens.

Charges cannot be filed against the private organization training the individuals unless a review is initiated.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The argument states that charges should be brought against the private organization because they are in violation of the US Neutrality Act by training recruits to fight against the Zandora Federation. However, if it is true that the individuals are being prepared to fight only in the event that the US goes to war against the Zandora Federation, this suggests…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

MotolaniApr 14, 2025

Thanks for sharingThank you for sharing!!thanks for sharing

PrathyooshNov 1, 2024

Can you explain more?

SantoshJan 11, 2024

thank you for sharing

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.