A scientist claims that individuals who consume high amounts of sugar have higher levels of hyperactivity compared to those who consume less sugar. However, my research indicates that hyperactivity levels increase after consuming sugary snacks. Therefore, excessive sugar consumption leads to a higher risk of developing hyperactivity disorders. What is a flaw in the reasoning presented above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

A. uses the term 'hyperactivity disorders' without clarification

B. does not explain what is meant by 'sugar consumption'

C. assumes that correlation implies causation

Correct

D. concludes based on a biased sample of participants

E. suggests that hyperactivity is a result of sugar consumption

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The scientist's reasoning suggests that because there is a correlation between high sugar consumption and increased hyperactivity, one causes the other. This is a classic example of the fallacy of assuming that correlation implies…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

ManishJan 16, 2025

can you explain more?

AliciaMar 17, 2025

Great explanation

PradApr 4, 2025

good question

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.