Archaeologists analyze the arrangement of ancient pottery to deduce the living conditions of past civilizations. Many pottery shards are found in a scattered pattern, which experts believe indicates a sudden disruption, possibly due to an earthquake. This leads to the conclusion that most of the pottery was destroyed in a natural disaster.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the reasoning above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

Archaeological studies show that pottery can also be scattered due to human activity, such as looting.

Correct

Research indicates that earthquakes often leave behind evidence of their occurrence in the surrounding area.

Experts have found that pottery can break and scatter over time due to natural weathering processes.

Many pottery shards found in the area are located near structures that were known to be unstable.

The scattered pattern of pottery is consistent with the effects of both earthquakes and strong winds.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The reasoning suggests that the scattered pottery shards are primarily due to a natural disaster, specifically an earthquake. To weaken this conclusion, we need evidence that suggests an alternative cause for the scattering of the pottery. Option A states that archaeological studies show that pottery can…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

RaparthyJan 15, 2025

Great!

julesMay 20, 2024

thanks a lot

ForOct 11, 2024

Thanks

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.