Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
Archaeologists analyze the arrangement of ancient artifacts to deduce the living conditions of past civilizations. Numerous artifacts are found in a scattered arrangement known as disarray, a condition that historians suggest is common in sites affected by natural disasters. This implies that most of the artifacts found in disarray were likely abandoned due to sudden flooding or other catastrophic events.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the reasoning above?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
Many artifacts found in disarray are located in areas that show signs of having experienced flooding or other disasters.
B
Studies have confirmed that the disarray of artifacts can also result from human activities over long periods.
Historians believe that certain diseases can cause communities to abandon their possessions, leading to disarray.
Correct
D
Natural disasters often create conditions that enhance the preservation of artifacts left behind.
E
The effects of flooding on ancient civilizations are similar to those observed in modern societies.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The reasoning suggests that artifacts found in disarray were likely abandoned due to sudden flooding or disasters. To weaken this reasoning, we need to introduce an alternative explanation for the disarray. Option C states that historians believe certain diseases can cause…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
P
PrashantFeb 20, 2025
Greatt
K
KOMALApr 12, 2025
taking my GMAT next month, this helps!
S
ShubhankarJan 27, 2025
This is exactly what I needed to practice
S
SusieDec 2, 2024
Can someone explain it other way?
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR