Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
Bacterial infections, such as those caused by certain strains of E. coli, can be transmitted from animals to humans through contaminated food. Although the outbreak of E. coli infections in North America in the early 2000s likely originated from specific livestock in the Midwest, the farmers who raised these animals did not report any illness. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that these farmers had some form of immunity to the E. coli strains present in their livestock.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowCertain strains of E. coli can be transmitted directly between humans without any animal involvement.
Correct
B
The livestock that were infected with E. coli were not present in the farmers' immediate vicinity.
C
Farmers often have a higher exposure to various bacteria and may develop immunity over time.
D
E. coli bacteria were spread from the Midwest to other regions through contaminated water supplies.
E
The feed given to the livestock was treated to eliminate harmful bacteria before consumption.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument suggests that the farmers did not get sick from E. coli because they had immunity to it. However, if certain strains of E. coli can be transmitted directly between humans without any animal involvement, this weakens the argument…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
M
MichoApr 22, 2025
greatt question!
S
SriNov 17, 2024
Tricky wording but good practice
A
AnubhavApr 19, 2025
thank you very much!
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR