Fitness coaches are professionals who help individuals achieve their health and fitness goals by providing personalized training programs and nutritional advice. With the rise of fitness apps and online resources, much of this information is now accessible to the general public. As more individuals utilize these digital tools, the demand for personal trainers is expected to decline significantly.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

Many individuals prefer personalized guidance and accountability that only a fitness coach can provide.

Correct

The number of fitness apps available is growing faster than the ability of most users to effectively utilize them.

Most people who engage in fitness activities do so without the help of a personal trainer.

Individuals who currently hire fitness coaches are also the ones most likely to adopt new fitness technologies.

Fitness apps and online resources are currently used by a limited segment of the population.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The argument suggests that as more individuals gain access to fitness apps and online resources, the demand for personal trainers will decline. To weaken this argument, we need to show that there are reasons why individuals might still prefer personal trainers despite the availability of these resources. The statement 'Many individuals prefer personalized…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

HiyoriJan 12, 2024

good question

VincentFeb 8, 2024

Amazing

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.