In March of last year, the Starview chain of coffee shops switched from using almond milk to oat milk for their lattes, claiming it would attract more health-conscious customers. However, Starview is now considering reverting to almond milk, arguing that the change has negatively impacted latte sales. This claim is misleading, as Starview's sales data shows that they sold 7% more lattes last year compared to the previous year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens Starview's argument?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowSee the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Official Explanation
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Great question!
Greatt
Thank for sharing!!!
I enjoy this question! I would love if someone tackled how to approach it (If there is a preference for 'Almond Milk' over 'Oat Milk' by the Starview customer base) we know that (Oat Milk) lattes were responsible for 7% higher sales than the prior year (also Oat Milk we can assume). How do customer preferences reflect a poor management decision if we do not have the corresponding performance/sales reports to analyze? I think this question would do well with a slight tweak taking into account the claims above, if not I will be posting my interpretation of the question/answers
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.