In several regions, extreme mountain biking, a sport where individuals ride bicycles down steep and rugged terrains, is prohibited. Advocates of this sport argue that participants are responsible for their own safety and should be permitted to engage in it in a free society, provided they do not endanger others. Consequently, these advocates assert that extreme mountain biking should be legalized. Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn by the advocates of extreme mountain biking EXCEPT:

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

(A) Many extreme mountain bikers are highly skilled and have successfully navigated challenging trails without accidents.

Correct

(B) The medical costs associated with injuries from extreme mountain biking have significantly increased, leading to higher insurance premiums for local hospitals.

(C) Local governments have had to allocate more funds for emergency services due to the rise in accidents involving extreme mountain bikers.

(D) There have been instances where extreme mountain bikers have collided with hikers, resulting in injuries.

(E) Extreme mountain bikers have been known to trespass on private property to access trails, causing disputes with landowners.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

To determine which statement does not weaken the conclusion that extreme mountain biking should be legalized, we analyze each option. The conclusion is that the sport should be allowed as long as it does not harm others. (A) suggests that experienced bikers can ride safely, which supports the idea that they can engage in the sport without causing harm, thus not weakening the conclusion. (B) indicates increased medical costs due to injuries, which weakens the conclusion by highlighting…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

AishaApr 14, 2025

Can someone explain it other way?

rohitOct 30, 2024

thanks a lot

PinkyFeb 8, 2024

Can you explain more?

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.