In several regions, extreme mountain biking, a sport where individuals ride bicycles down steep and rugged terrains, is prohibited. Advocates of the sport argue that participants are responsible for their own safety and should be allowed to engage in this activity in a free society, provided they do not endanger others. Consequently, these advocates conclude that extreme mountain biking should be legalized. Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn by the advocates of extreme mountain biking EXCEPT:

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

Many extreme mountain bikers are highly skilled and have completed numerous rides without accidents.

Correct

The medical costs associated with injuries from extreme mountain biking have significantly increased, leading to higher insurance premiums for local hospitals.

Local governments have had to allocate more resources to manage the safety of biking trails due to increased incidents.

In some instances, extreme mountain bikers have caused injuries to hikers on the trails.

Extreme mountain bikers have been reported to damage private property while accessing trails.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

To determine which statement does not weaken the advocates' conclusion, we analyze each option. The advocates argue that extreme mountain biking should be legalized as long as it does not harm others. Option A states that many bikers are skilled and have completed rides without accidents, which supports the…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

BTSApr 6, 2025

thanks for the answer

AndrewFeb 6, 2025

greatt question!

LeoJul 11, 2024

good question

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.