Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
In several regions, extreme mountain biking, a sport where individuals ride bicycles down steep and rugged terrains, is prohibited. Advocates of this sport argue that participants are responsible for their own safety and should be permitted to engage in it in a free society, provided they do not endanger others. Consequently, these advocates conclude that extreme mountain biking should be legalized. Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn by the advocates of extreme mountain biking EXCEPT:
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked below(A) Many extreme mountain bikers are highly skilled and have completed numerous rides without any accidents.
Correct
B
(B) The medical costs associated with injuries from extreme mountain biking have significantly increased, leading to higher insurance premiums for local hospitals.
C
(C) Local governments have had to allocate more funds to rescue operations for injured mountain bikers.
D
(D) There have been instances where mountain bikers have collided with hikers, resulting in injuries.
E
(E) Extreme mountain bikers have been known to damage trails and natural habitats while riding.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
To determine which option does not weaken the conclusion that extreme mountain biking should be legalized, we analyze each statement. The conclusion is based on the premise that individuals should be allowed to take risks as long as they do not harm others.
(A) This statement supports the idea that experienced bikers can ride safely, which does not weaken the conclusion.
(B) This statement indicates that injuries from mountain biking are costly, which could suggest a societal burden and weaken the conclusion.
(C) This statement implies that mountain biking leads to increased rescue operations, indicating a risk to public safety, thus weakening the conclusion.…
(A) This statement supports the idea that experienced bikers can ride safely, which does not weaken the conclusion.
(B) This statement indicates that injuries from mountain biking are costly, which could suggest a societal burden and weaken the conclusion.
(C) This statement implies that mountain biking leads to increased rescue operations, indicating a risk to public safety, thus weakening the conclusion.…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
Y
YHFeb 25, 2025
thanks a lot
K
KaydenJan 25, 2025
Tricky wording but good practice
M
MikeMay 9, 2024
pls explain more?
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR