Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
It is true that unionized men earn, on average, more than 40% more than nonunionized men do. However, the unionized men work in sectors where salaries tend to be high, and their nonunionized counterparts in these sectors earn nearly the same as they do. Therefore, unionization does not increase men’s wages.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
The most highly paid men are in managerial roles, which are typically not unionized.
B
Unionized workers often receive additional benefits such as retirement plans and job security.
C
Wage levels in various sectors differ significantly from one region to another, irrespective of union status.
Nonunionized men in a sector frequently benefit from wage increases due to negotiations made by unions representing other workers in the same sector.
Correct
E
The unionization of men working for one company in a specific sector often leads to the unionization of men working for other companies in that sector.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument states that unionization does not raise men's wages because unionized men earn more, but they work in high-paying sectors where nonunionized men earn similarly. To weaken this argument, we need to show that unionization has a positive effect on wages. Option D states that nonunionized men in a sector…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
2
Sign in to join the discussion
G
gokulFeb 19, 2025
Great question!
A
AnkitFeb 17, 2025
Great!
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR