Many environmental advocates support the elimination of regulations on activities deemed 'non-harmful,' which typically include practices like camping, hiking, and fishing. However, it is debatable whether fishing can genuinely be classified as a non-harmful activity. Beyond the ecological impact on fish populations, the practice can lead to significant distress for those who care about the environment, such as conservationists and local communities, who may witness the depletion of natural resources. In this sense, fishing cannot easily be considered a non-harmful activity.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

Fishing can also lead to economic benefits for local communities, which may offset environmental concerns.

Many outdoor activities, including camping and hiking, can also have negative impacts on the environment.

Those who are concerned about environmental issues cannot strictly be considered victims of fishing practices.

Correct

Not all environmental advocates agree that all regulations on non-harmful activities should be removed.

Evidence suggests that attempts to regulate fishing have often been ineffective.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The argument states that fishing causes distress to those who care about the environment, implying that it is not a non-harmful activity. To weaken this argument, we need to show that the distress caused to these individuals does not qualify them as victims of fishing practices. Option C states that 'Those who are concerned about…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

AlkaApr 1, 2025

thanks a lot

Evéa-RoseApr 29, 2024

Tricky wording but good practice

VincentApr 13, 2024

thanks for the answer

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.