Some parents have noticed that their children refuse to drink plain milk. To encourage their children to consume more liquids, they start adding chocolate syrup to the milk. However, this syrup contains a significant amount of sugar and various additives. Given that dehydration can be a serious issue, sometimes leading to severe health problems, parents feel justified in using chocolate syrup to make milk more appealing.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the argument's conclusion?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

Adding a small amount of vanilla extract can make milk more enjoyable for children without adding excessive sugar.

Correct

Many children prefer flavored milk over plain milk, regardless of the sugar content.

Dehydration can also occur due to lack of physical activity and not just from refusing to drink liquids.

Chocolate syrup is often made from cocoa, which is a natural ingredient.

In colder climates, children are less likely to become dehydrated due to lower temperatures.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The argument concludes that parents should use chocolate syrup to make milk more appealing to prevent dehydration. However, if adding a small amount of vanilla extract can make milk more enjoyable for children without adding excessive sugar,…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

saranyaJan 29, 2025

can you explain more?

AngelinaJan 17, 2025

Can someone explain it other way?

PriyanshuDec 11, 2024

thanks for taking time to upload it!

IsabellaMar 7, 2025

Thanks

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.