Some parents have noticed that their children refuse to drink plain water. To encourage hydration, they sometimes add sweeteners to the water. However, these sweeteners often contain high levels of sugar and various additives. Given that dehydration can be dangerous, parents feel compelled to use these sweeteners to ensure their children stay hydrated.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the argument's conclusion?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

Natural fruit slices can enhance the flavor of water without adding sugar.

Correct

Many children prefer flavored drinks over plain water.

Dehydration can also result from not eating enough food.

Sweeteners are often derived from natural sources.

In hot weather, children are less likely to drink water.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The argument suggests that using sweeteners is necessary to prevent dehydration in children who refuse to drink plain water. However, if it is true that 'Natural fruit slices can enhance the flavor of water without adding sugar,' this undermines the…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

BraedonFeb 21, 2025

thanks

GFeb 25, 2025

thank you taking time to upload it!

LuisJun 28, 2024

thanks

PoojaJan 17, 2025

thanks a lot

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.