Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
Stockholders have expressed concerns about the GreenLeaf Company, a prominent furniture manufacturer, because most of GreenLeaf's furniture is produced in Country Y using local timber, where illegal logging is prevalent. To address these concerns, GreenLeaf has implemented a certification program for lumber suppliers. They have employed a team of auditors and forestry experts who examine the documentation of the timber supply from Country Y's suppliers to confirm its legal origin, conduct unannounced inspections to verify records, and certify suppliers as approved sources of legally sourced timber. GreenLeaf exclusively uses timber from certified suppliers. Therefore, GreenLeaf's assertion that its timber supply from Country Y is legally sourced is deemed valid.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the justification for GreenLeaf's assertion?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
The government of Country Y has recently increased its enforcement against illegal logging.
B
Only about 15% of GreenLeaf's suppliers are certified by the program.
C
GreenLeaf has invested significantly in training its inspectors.
The majority of timber suppliers in Country Y are not subject to any inspections.
Correct
E
GreenLeaf's inspectors are primarily volunteers from local communities.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
To determine which statement most undermines GreenLeaf's claim, we need to assess how each option affects the credibility of the certification program. The key point is that GreenLeaf claims its timber supply is legally sourced based on its certification program. If only a small fraction of suppliers are inspected, it raises doubts about the effectiveness of the…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
3
3.18127E+11Feb 16, 2025
Love how you solved this
N
nidhiJan 7, 2024
Can someone explain it other way?
S
SriramJul 18, 2024
thanks
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.
Related GMAT Topic Guides
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR