The gap in average monthly salaries between workers with specialized certifications and those without such certifications increased significantly from 2010 to 2020. Some experts believe that heightened demand for skilled workers led to this increase in salaries.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously challenges the explanation provided above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

During the 2010s, a significant number of certified workers were unable to find jobs in their field and took lower-paying positions.

Correct

The overall workforce age increased during the 2010s.

The job market remained relatively stable throughout the 2010s.

From 2010 to 2020, the salary difference between workers with advanced certifications and those with basic certifications also grew.

Throughout the 2010s, there were several workers without certifications who earned salaries comparable to those of certified workers.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

To determine which statement most seriously undermines the explanation that increased demand for skilled workers led to higher salaries for certified workers, we analyze each option. The correct answer is the first option: 'During the 2010s, a significant number of certified workers were unable to find jobs in their field and took lower-paying positions.' This suggests that despite the increase in salaries for certified workers, many were not…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

KonstantinaJan 3, 2025

Good question

DikshaJan 5, 2025

taking my GMAT next month, this helps!

ApuFeb 14, 2025

thanks!

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Common trap

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.