Guillemots are birds of Arctic regions. They feed on fish that gather beneath thin sheets of floating ice, and they nest on nearby land. Guillemots need 80 consecutive snow-free days in a year to raise their chicks, so until average temperatures in the Arctic began to rise recently, the guillemots’ range was limited to the southernmost Arctic coast. Therefore, if the warming continues, the guillemots’ range will probably be enlarged by being extended northward along the coast.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Correct answer marked below

Even if the warming trend continues, there will still be years in which guillemot chicks are killed by an unusually early snow.

If the Arctic warming continues, guillemots’ current predators are likely to succeed in extending their own range farther north.

Guillemots nest in coastal areas, where temperatures are generally higher than in inland areas.

If the Arctic warming continues, much of the thin ice in the southern Arctic will disappear.

Correct

The fish that guillemots eat are currently preyed on by a wider variety of predators in the southernmost Arctic regions than they are farther north.

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Explanation

Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.

Comments

Be the first to share your thoughts and help others understand it better.

What this question tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.