Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Laminated glass is much harder to break than the glass typically used in the windows of cars driven in Relnia. It is more difficult for thieves to break into cars with laminated glass windows than into cars with ordinary glass windows, and laminated glass windows are less likely to break in a collision. Nevertheless, considerations of security and safety do not unambiguously support a proposal to require that in Relnia all glass installed in cars be laminated glass, since __________.

E jumped out at me right away. If someone's trapped in a car, being able to smash the window is a safety feature, not a bug. So requiring laminated glass could actually make things more dangerous in that scenario.

This was pretty easy ngl. The passage says security AND safety don't unambiguously support the proposal, so we need something showing a downside to laminated glass. E does that perfectly.

wait why is A wrong? if people can't tell the difference, wouldn't that... hmm actually I don't see how that matters at all for whether we should require it.