A journalist states: "The governor's challengers argue that the issues surrounding the deputy governor's financial disclosures render the governor unqualified for re-election. However, the deputy governor was elected by the citizens in a previous election before the governor took office. Additionally, the deputy governor's financial discrepancies can be attributed to a minor oversight by an accountant and do not reflect on the deputy governor's capability to fulfill his responsibilities.".

Which of the following best captures the main point of the argument presented above?

Answer Choices

Correct answer marked below

The governor is unqualified for re-election.

The deputy governor is capable of fulfilling his responsibilities.

Critics should not conflate the governor's qualifications with the deputy governor's qualifications.

The governor's challengers' claims regarding the deputy governor's financial issues in relation to the governor's re-election are fundamentally flawed.

Correct

The deputy governor is responsible for the errors in his financial disclosures.

See the full step-by-step explanation

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Track your performance and improve

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Start for free Sign in

Explanation

Preview

Official Explanation

Official

The main point of the argument is that the claims made by the governor's challengers about the deputy governor's financial issues do not accurately reflect on the governor's qualifications for re-election. The journalist emphasizes that the deputy governor was elected separately and…

Read the full explanation

Create free account Sign in

Comments

AdityaMar 22, 2025

Thank for sharing!

VaishnaviApr 4, 2025

thanks for taking time to upload it!

PrathamOct 28, 2024

finally understood this

IanApr 10, 2025

Thank for sharing!!!

What this question tests

What it tests

Whether you can identify the argument's main conclusion as opposed to a supporting premise.

Common trap

Selecting a restatement of a premise or a side point instead of the central conclusion.