Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
605-655
Conclusion
Recent regulations that mandate separate areas for smokers and non-smokers in privately owned establishments are seen as an unwarranted interference in the private sector. While research shows that non-smokers could be adversely affected by secondhand smoke, the core issue lies in the government's infringement on the rights of private businesses to set their own policies. Which principle, if accepted, would support this conclusion?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowThe right of businesses to self-governance takes precedence over any obligation the government has to safeguard individuals.
Correct
B
Government interference in the operations of private businesses is acceptable only when there is a risk of harm to individuals.
C
The obligation of private businesses is to ensure a safe environment for their employees.
D
The right of individuals to access clean air is more important than the autonomy of businesses from government oversight.
E
When the rights of businesses clash with government responsibilities, the focus should be on achieving a workable compromise.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
To arrive at the correct solution, we need to analyze the argument presented. The argument states that the legislation requiring designated areas for smokers and non-smokers is an unjustified intrusion into the rights of private businesses. The conclusion drawn is that businesses should have the right to determine their own policies without…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
A
AlessandroFeb 17, 2025
Amazing
S
sawaiMay 4, 2025
thanks for taking time to upload it!
T
TvMar 7, 2025
this helped me
R
RhythmDec 10, 2024
thank you very much!
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the argument's main conclusion as opposed to a supporting premise.
Common trap
Selecting a restatement of a premise or a side point instead of the central conclusion.
Details
Difficulty
605-655
Type
CR