Some analysts contend that government oversight of markets contradicts the principles of a free society because it restricts individuals' ability to act in their own economic interests. In a controlled market, citizens may not have the freedom to decide where to establish their businesses or whom to employ. If individuals cannot fully exercise their economic choices based solely on their personal interests, then the society cannot be considered truly free. However, this viewpoint fails to recognize that the concept of a free society includes two distinct, yet complementary objectives: 1) to safeguard individual freedom and 2) to enhance the collective welfare of the community. A certain level of market oversight might be essential to achieve the latter objective, as one person's freedom to act can sometimes infringe upon the freedoms of others.

Which of the following best captures the main conclusion of the argument?