Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
605-655
Conclusion
Some researchers have proposed that the Brachiosaurus, a massive dinosaur, was capable of running swiftly. However, this seems improbable, as running would likely have caused severe injuries to Brachiosaurus's legs. Studies on contemporary bones indicate the maximum stress they can endure before fracturing. By analyzing the thickness and weight of Brachiosaurus leg bones, it can be determined that those bones could not have handled the stresses of running.
Which of the following best summarizes the conclusion drawn by the argument as a whole?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowA
Running would likely have caused severe injuries to the legs of Brachiosaurus.
B
It can be determined that Brachiosaurus leg bones could not have handled the stress of running.
The assertion by researchers that Brachiosaurus was capable of running swiftly is probably incorrect.
Correct
D
If running would have caused severe injuries to the legs of Brachiosaurus, then Brachiosaurus was likely unable to run swiftly.
E
Contemporary bones are very similar in structure and physical properties to the bones of Brachiosaurus.
See the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Preview
Official Explanation
Official
The argument begins by stating that some researchers believe Brachiosaurus could run swiftly, but then presents reasons to doubt this claim. It suggests that running would likely injure the dinosaur's legs and that studies on modern bones show how much stress they can…
Read the full explanation
Sign in for free to see the complete step-by-step solution to this question.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
A
ArtemFeb 2, 2025
can you explain more?
D
deekshaJan 24, 2025
Thank for sharing!
P
pratikAug 1, 2024
thanks for posting
A
AramMay 26, 2024
Can you explain more?
What this question tests
What it tests
Whether you can identify the argument's main conclusion as opposed to a supporting premise.
Common trap
Selecting a restatement of a premise or a side point instead of the central conclusion.
Details
Difficulty
605-655
Type
CR