In constructing a persuasive argument, it is crucial to differentiate between hypothesis and evidence, and to understand the role of each. A hypothesis proposes an idea or assumption that may hold true, but it necessitates evidence to substantiate it. Evidence serves as the validation or proof that supports a hypothesis; without evidence, the hypothesis remains merely a theoretical notion. While a hypothesis can be relevant in a persuasive argument, it must be grounded in relevant evidence from comparable instances. An argument based solely on a hypothesis often leads to conjecture, whereas an argument that incorporates a hypothesis supported by relevant evidence can be quite compelling.

Which of the following does the passage above suggest?