Neighboring landholders: Air pollution from the giant aluminum refinery that has been built next to our land is killing our plants.
Company spokesperson: The refinery is not to blame, since our study shows that the damage is due to insects and fungi.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn by the company spokesperson?

Correct answer marked below

The study did not measure the quantity of pollutants emitted into the surrounding air by the aluminum refinery.

The neighboring landholders have made no change in the way they take care of their plants.

Air pollution from the refinery has changed the chemical balance in the plants’ environment, allowing the harmful insects and fungi to thrive.

Correct

Pollutants that are invisible and odorless are emitted into the surrounding air by the refinery.

The various species of insects and fungi mentioned in the study have been occasionally found in the locality during the past hundred years.

You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.

Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.

Explanation

Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.

Comments

Be the first to share your thoughts and help others understand it better.

What this question tests

Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.

Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.