A variety of different foods offered in multiple feeders will attract a high number of birds of many species. This is because different birds favor different foods, and multiple feeders allow more birds to feed at the same time. However, if too many feeders are placed in one area, the number of species attracted will decrease.
Which of the following best helps to explain the result of placing too many bird feeders in one area?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowSee the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
this one was pretty straightforward once I noticed the phrase about too many feeders. The exception to the rule was the key.
right, the word "however" is basically a flashing sign telling you the paradox is coming.
for some reason I was stuck between B and E. B seemed smart because it mentioned different foods but I think it's talking about seasonal changes rather than having too many feeders?
yeah B just gives advice about adjusting feeders, it doesn't explain why species would drop. E is about one flock taking over the whole area.
E makes sense, a bunch of big birds hog all the feeders and the smaller species stop showing up. classic dominance thing.
got it right but only after picturing a backyard full of pigeons lol. easy points if you remember the question is asking what explains the decrease.
that mental image helped more than it should have 😂
What it tests
Whether you can explain an apparent contradiction in a way that makes both facts true.
Common trap
Picking an option that explains one side of the paradox while making the other side false.