If we are to expand the exploration of our solar system our next manned flight should be to Phobos, one of Mars's moons, rather than to Mars itself. The flight times to each are the same but the Phobos expedition would require less than half the fuel load of a Mars expedition and would, therefore, be much less costly. So, it is clear that Phobos should be our next step in space exploration.
Which one of the following, if true, would most help to explain the difference in fuel requirement?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowSee the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
wait, why is this a resolve the paradox? isn't it just a normal explain question? the fuel thing didn't seem like a paradox to me lol
thanks, this one was easy. got it in like 40 seconds.
huh, I picked D at first because it mentioned distance and fuel is about distance right? then realized the trip times are the same so distance doesn't explain anything. sneaky.
What it tests
Whether you can explain an apparent contradiction in a way that makes both facts true.
Common trap
Picking an option that explains one side of the paradox while making the other side false.