In an experiment testing whether hyperactivity is due to a brain abnormality, the brain activity of 25 hyperactive adults was compared to the brain activity of 25 adults who were not hyperactive. The tests revealed that the hyperactive adults had much less brain activity in the premotor cortex, a region of the brain believed to control action, than did the non-hyperactive adults. The experimenters concluded that diminished activity in the premotor cortex is one cause of hyperactivity.
Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the conclusion drawn by the experimenters?
Answer Choices
Correct answer marked belowSee the full step-by-step explanation
You can see the correct answer above. Sign in for free to unlock the complete worked solution.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Easy D. Medication depresses brain activity, so the low premotor activity could just be a side effect of the treatment, not the cause of the hyperactivity. Classic correlation vs causation trap.
yeah exactly, the meds give an alternate explanation for the low activity. took me a sec to see it but once you catch that it's over
wait why is A wrong? I thought it might mess with the study somehow
A talks about the non-hyperactive adults' kids, that doesn't really touch whether low premotor activity causes hyperactivity in these adults. it's just irrelevant background
ohhh got it, so A doesn't give another cause for the low activity. thanks!
got tripped up between B and D for a second but B is about severity variation within the hyperactive group, doesn't explain the difference between the two groups at all. D gives the clean alternative explanation
What it tests
Whether you can identify the option that most undermines an argument's conclusion.
Common trap
Choosing an irrelevant objection or one that attacks the premise rather than the reasoning.